Skip to content
MyFreud

Does Venting Anger Help? What the Evidence Says

Hitting something to let the anger out is the best known piece of psychology advice there is, and the evidence says it does the opposite of what you want.

5 min read

Pop-art illustration of a bearded man facing forward with his brows drawn together and his teeth bared, against a flat blue background.

Key takeaways

  • Venting does not discharge anger. When people hit a punching bag while thinking about the person who angered them, they end up angrier and more aggressive than people who did nothing at all.
  • The idea that anger builds up like pressure in a boiler is a metaphor, not a mechanism. Nothing accumulates, so there is nothing to release.
  • A 2024 review of 154 studies and over 10,000 people found the useful split is not physical versus verbal but whether the activity raises or lowers your arousal.
  • Arousal-lowering activities reduced anger fairly consistently. Arousal-raising ones, including jogging and hitting things, mostly did not, and some made it worse.
  • Rumination is the active ingredient in venting. Going over what happened while doing something physical is rehearsal, and rehearsal is what keeps the anger loaded.

Venting does not work. Hitting something to let the anger out is probably the single best known piece of psychology advice in circulation, and when it has been tested it produces more anger rather than less.

That is worth stating flatly at the start, because almost everybody has been told the opposite by somebody they trusted.

Where the idea came from

The catharsis idea is a metaphor that escaped and got treated as a mechanism. It says anger accumulates like steam in a boiler, and that unless you open a valve the pressure will find its own way out, so expressing it now prevents something worse later.

It is an appealing picture and it is doing no work. There is no reservoir, nothing is filling up, and so there is nothing that needs releasing. Once you stop assuming the plumbing exists, the advice built on it has nothing holding it up.

What happened when it was tested

People who vented ended up angrier than people who did nothing. In the study most often cited on this, participants were deliberately angered, then either hit a punching bag while thinking about the person who had angered them, hit the bag while thinking about getting fit, or sat quietly. [bushman-2002-venting]

The order of the results is the interesting part. The people who hit the bag while thinking about the person were the angriest and behaved most aggressively afterwards. The distraction group came second. The people who did nothing at all came out best.

So the punching bag was not neutral. Combined with dwelling on the grievance, it was worse than sitting still.

Arousal is the thing that matters

The useful split is not physical versus verbal, or expressed versus held in, but whether an activity raises or lowers your physical arousal. A 2024 review pooled 154 studies covering more than 10,000 people and organised anger interventions along exactly that line. [kjaervik-2024-anger-meta]

Arousal-lowering activities, including slow breathing, mindfulness, meditation and relaxation, reduced anger fairly consistently, across lab and real-world settings, in groups and individually. Arousal-raising activities generally did not, and some increased it.

What the split actually is Illustrative
0 25 50 75 100 How much it lowers anger 82 Slowing the breath 64 Doing nothing for ten minutes 24 Going for a hard run 12 Hitting something
0 25 50 75 100 How much it lowers anger 40 Slowing the breath 15 Doing nothing for ten minutes 78 Going for a hard run 88 Hitting something

A schematic of the arousal distinction described in this article and in the 2024 review cited. Not measured data.

Note what this does not say. Running is good for you and it is good for mood in general. It is just not a way to bring down anger in the twenty minutes after something has happened, because it keeps your body in the state anger already put it in.

Rumination is the active ingredient

The thing that makes venting harmful is the thinking, not the movement. In the punching bag study, the same physical act produced different outcomes depending on what participants were told to think about, and the group told to dwell on the person came out worst. [bushman-2002-venting]

That reframes a lot of everyday behaviour. Telling the story of what happened for the fourth time this evening, with the same heat, is not processing. It is rehearsal, and what gets rehearsed gets easier to reach.

The distinction worth holding: are you getting further through the problem each time you tell it, or only further into the feeling? Our guide to why you feel so irritable covers the background conditions that make the fuse short in the first place, which is usually where the real work is.

Which of these do you do when you are angry?

Tick anything true. This is a reflection prompt rather than a test, and it produces no diagnosis.

0 of 8 ticked

No screener on this site measures anger. The hub lists what we do cover. Anger sits close to several of them, and if you want a starting point the stress and depression screeners are often the more revealing ones, because persistent irritability is a common feature of both.

What to do instead

Slow the out-breath. Longer out than in, for a couple of minutes. This is the intervention with the best ratio of effort to effect, and it works because it directly lowers the arousal that everything else here is about. Our guide to breathing exercises for anger covers which patterns survive being furious and why deep breathing sometimes makes it worse.

Leave the room. Not as a statement, just physically. Distance from the trigger does more than willpower in front of it.

Delay the response. Write the message and do not send it. Almost nothing gets worse for waiting an hour, and quite a lot gets better.

Notice when telling it stops helping. The first telling usually helps. The fourth is rehearsal. That transition is the moment to stop.

Then act on it. This is the half that gets lost when people hear that venting does not work. Anger is usually information about something that genuinely needs addressing, and the point of lowering the arousal is to be able to address it well. Our guide to anger management therapy covers what structured help involves.

Do not simply sit on it instead. The evidence against venting is not evidence for suppression, which has costs of its own.

When to seek help

See a doctor or ask about therapy if anger is damaging your relationships or your work, if you have frightened somebody, if you lose time or do not fully recall what you did while angry, or if you are using alcohol or drugs to manage it.

Get help urgently if you have hurt someone or believe you might. Several countries run a confidential line specifically for people worried about their own abusive behaviour, which is a different service from a victim helpline and is the one to look for here.

Go urgently if you have thoughts of harming yourself.

How MyFreud can help

Anger is rarely about the thing that triggered it, and the pattern of what preceded a bad week is invisible day to day. MyFreud gives you daily mood tracking that takes seconds, so the short fuse becomes something you can look back at rather than reconstruct from memory.

Download MyFreud and start today: App Store or Google Play.

Frequently asked questions

Does hitting a pillow or punching bag help with anger?

No, and it tends to do the opposite. In a well-known experiment, people who had been angered hit a punching bag while thinking about the person who angered them, and afterwards reported more anger and behaved more aggressively than people who sat quietly instead. The physical act does not drain anything. What it does is keep your attention on the grievance while your body stays highly activated, which is close to a definition of practising being angry.

Why does venting feel like it works, then?

Two reasons. Anger falls on its own over time, so whatever you happened to be doing while it fell gets the credit. And venting is genuinely satisfying in the moment, because acting on an urge relieves the pressure of resisting it. Feeling better briefly and being less angry afterwards are different things, and only the first is what venting reliably delivers.

What actually reduces anger in the moment?

Activities that lower your physical arousal rather than raise it. A 2024 review across 154 studies found slow breathing, mindfulness, meditation, relaxation and similar approaches reduced anger fairly consistently, while arousal-raising activities including jogging, cycling and hitting things generally did not. The practical version is to slow the out-breath, put physical distance between yourself and the trigger, and delay any response.

Is talking about what made me angry the same as venting?

It depends entirely on what the talking does. Describing what happened in order to work out what you want to do next is problem-solving. Going over it repeatedly, with heat, rehearsing what you should have said, is rumination, and rumination is the part that keeps anger alive. The test is whether you are getting further through the problem each time you tell it, or just further into the feeling.

So should I suppress my anger instead?

No, and that is a false choice. The evidence against venting is not an argument for pretending you are fine, which has its own costs. Anger is information about a boundary being crossed and it usually deserves acting on. The distinction is between feeling and expressing it in a way that changes something, and discharging it in a way that changes nothing but your arousal level.

References

  1. 1.Bushman BJ ( 2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 724-731. doi:10.1177/0146167202289002
  2. 2.Kjærvik SL, Bushman BJ ( 2024). A meta-analytic review of anger management activities that increase or decrease arousal: what fuels or douses rage?. Clinical Psychology Review, 109, 102414. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102414