Skip to content
MyFreud

By , Editorial Team Published

Shopping Addiction: Is It a Real Condition?

It is not a standalone diagnosis in either main manual, and researchers argued it should be. What the evidence supports, and why the prevalence figure moves.

4 min read

Flat vector illustration of a woman in a coat and red scarf walking along a pavement carrying two unbranded shopping bags.

Key takeaways

  • It is not a standalone diagnosis in either of the main manuals, which is a statement about classification rather than about whether the pattern exists. A group of researchers argued in 2019 that the evidence was strong enough for it to be included.
  • The number people quote is unstable, and the reason is worth knowing. A meta-analysis of 40 studies found roughly 5 percent in representative adult samples and more than three times that in samples recruited while shopping.
  • That spread is not a flaw in the research, it is the finding. The headline figure depends almost entirely on who was asked and which questionnaire was used, so any single number quoted without that context is close to meaningless.
  • What separates the pattern from enjoying shopping is not the amount spent. It is buying to change how you feel rather than to obtain the thing, losing control of the amount, and continuing despite consequences you can name.
  • The purchase is usually not the point, which is why decluttering and budgeting apps rarely touch it. Many people describe the relief arriving at the moment of buying and the items themselves staying unopened.

Compulsive buying is a well documented pattern that does not have its own entry in either of the main diagnostic manuals. Those two facts sit together more comfortably than they sound, and separating them answers most of what people actually want to know.

Our overview of behavioural addictions covers how this category is defined and argued about; this article is about the specific case, which is among the most common and the least formally recognised.

What the classification actually says

That it is not a standalone diagnosis, which is a statement about how the manuals are organised rather than a judgement that the pattern is imaginary. In 2019 a group of researchers in the field published an argument that the accumulated evidence justified recognising it, on the grounds that it shows the features used to define behavioural addictions generally. [muller-2019-buying-shopping]

What this means in a consulting room is less dramatic than it sounds. A clinician will recognise the description, and may record it under a broader heading. The absence of a dedicated label changes the paperwork rather than whether anyone will take it seriously.

Why the number keeps changing

Because the answer depends almost entirely on who was asked. A meta-analysis pooling 40 studies from 16 countries, covering around 32,000 people, found rates that differ by more than threefold across sample types. [maraz-2016-compulsive-buying]

The same condition, four different answers
0 25 50 75 100 Percentage meeting criteria 4.9 Representative adults 8.3 University students 12.3 Other adult samples 16.2 Recruited while shopping

Pooled prevalence estimates by sample type reported in Maraz, Griffiths and Demetrovics (2016), a meta-analysis of 40 studies from 16 countries.

The spread is the finding rather than a weakness in the research. Ask people in a shopping centre and you will find more of them than in a representative sample, which is unsurprising and is exactly why a figure quoted without its source tells you very little. The defensible summary is roughly one adult in twenty, with wide uncertainty around it.

What actually separates it from enjoying shopping

Not the amount spent, which is where almost everyone starts and which does not work. Someone on a low income can meet every feature of the pattern while spending modestly, and someone wealthy can spend far more and meet none of it.

The features are about function rather than quantity. Buying to change how you feel rather than to obtain the thing. Tension building beforehand and relief at the moment of purchase. Losing control of how much is bought once started. Carrying on despite consequences you can name without prompting.

The most telling marker is quiet and physical: what happens to the items. Bags that stay unopened, tags left on, things bought in duplicate because the first one was forgotten. If the objects were the point, they would be used.

Which part is doing the work?

This is a prompt for thinking, not a test, and it is about function rather than amount. Think about the past few months.

0 of 5 ticked

Why budgeting advice tends to fail

Because it removes the method and leaves the need. If buying is regulating something, a budget is a constraint on the tool rather than an answer to the job it was doing, and the usual course is a period of control followed by a return. Decluttering brings the same short relief for the same reason.

That does not make practical friction useless. Removing saved card details, uninstalling the apps, waiting a day before anything over a set amount: these help, and they help most when they are alongside dealing with what precedes an episode rather than instead of it. Our guide to habit versus addiction covers why that distinction changes what works.

What this does not establish

None of this diagnoses anyone, and the classification question is genuinely open rather than settled in either direction. Researchers disagree about whether this is best understood as an addictive behaviour, an impulse control problem, or a feature of something else such as a mood disorder.

The prevalence figures are also estimates using different questionnaires in different countries, which is precisely what the spread above demonstrates, and none of them was designed to tell you about yourself.

When to seek help

Speak to a doctor if buying is costing you money you do not have, if you are hiding it, or if you have tried to stop and could not. Mention mood and anxiety in the same conversation, because they frequently sit alongside this and they are treatable whatever the buying is eventually called.

Seek help sooner if debt has reached the point of affecting where you live or what you eat, or if you have had thoughts that things would be simpler without you. Financial pressure and hopelessness are a combination worth naming out loud rather than managing alone.

If you are having thoughts of harming yourself, treat that as urgent and contact your local emergency services or a crisis helpline.

How MyFreud can help

MyFreud is useful here for the thing that precedes an episode, which is the part nobody can recall accurately afterwards. Logging mood alongside what happened that day makes the trigger visible, and a trigger you can see coming is a different problem from one that appears to arrive from nowhere.

Download MyFreud and start today: App Store or Google Play.

Frequently asked questions

Is shopping addiction a real disorder?

The pattern is real and well documented; its classification is unsettled. It is not a standalone diagnosis in either of the two main manuals used worldwide, and in 2019 a group of researchers published an argument that the accumulated evidence justified including it as a recognised condition, on the grounds that it shows the features used to define behavioural addictions. The practical upshot is that a clinician will recognise what you are describing and may record it under a broader category. Not having its own entry in a manual is a statement about how the classification systems are organised, not a verdict that nothing is happening.

How common is compulsive buying?

That depends so heavily on who was asked that a single figure is misleading. A meta-analysis pooling 40 studies across 16 countries and around 32,000 people found roughly 4.9 percent in representative adult samples, about 8.3 percent among university students, about 12.3 percent in non-representative adult samples, and about 16.2 percent in samples recruited specifically among shoppers. The gap between the first and last of those is more than threefold, and it reflects the population sampled and the questionnaire used rather than any real difference of that size. Treat roughly one in twenty adults as the defensible version.

What is the difference between liking shopping and compulsive buying?

Not the amount of money, which is the assumption almost everyone starts with. The features that define the pattern are functional: buying to change an emotional state rather than to obtain the item, a loss of control over how much is bought, a build-up of tension beforehand and relief at the point of purchase, and continuing despite consequences you can clearly name. Someone on a low income can meet all of that and someone wealthy can spend far more and meet none of it. A useful marker is what happens to the things afterwards, since purchases that stay unopened suggest the buying was the point.

Why does budgeting advice not fix it?

Because it addresses the spending and the spending is the symptom. If buying is doing a job, most often regulating an emotional state, then a budget removes the method without touching the need, which is why the usual pattern is a period of control followed by a return. The same logic explains why decluttering brings relief that does not last. What tends to help is treating it as a behaviour that serves a function, identifying what reliably precedes an episode, and dealing with that, alongside practical friction on the buying itself rather than instead of it.

When should someone get help for this?

When it is costing something you can name and has not responded to your own attempts to stop, which is a lower threshold than most people apply to themselves. Debt, hiding purchases from people close to you, arguments about money, and buying to manage feelings you cannot otherwise shift are all reasons to raise it. Raise it with a doctor rather than only with a money adviser, because the two halves need addressing together and the emotional half is the one that usually goes unmentioned. Depression, anxiety and other difficulties frequently sit alongside it, and they are treatable regardless of how the buying itself is classified.

References

  1. 1.Müller A, Brand M, Claes L, Demetrovics Z, de Zwaan M, Fernández-Aranda F, Frost RO, et al. ( 2019). Buying-shopping disorder: is there enough evidence to support its inclusion in ICD-11?. CNS Spectrums. doi:10.1017/S1092852918001323
  2. 2.Maraz A, Griffiths MD, Demetrovics Z ( 2016). The prevalence of compulsive buying: a meta-analysis. Addiction. doi:10.1111/add.13223

Related articles

Behavioural Addictions: Where the Line Is

Only two behaviours are recognised as addictions: gambling and gaming. Why the bar is set there, what separates a heavy habit from a disorder, and what helps.

Pornography Addiction: What the Evidence Shows

Most people who worry they are addicted do not meet the clinical criteria. What compulsive sexual behaviour disorder actually requires, and what guilt does not.

Are Loot Boxes a Form of Gambling?

Loot boxes use the same randomised-reward structure as gambling, and studies link spending on them to problem-gambling severity. What the evidence shows.

Exercise Addiction: When Training Stops Helping

Most exercise addiction is not really about exercise. It sits alongside an eating disorder, and which of the two it is decides what actually needs treating.